Talk:List of newspapers in the United Kingdom by circulation

Updated graphs
Hi, I updated the circulation graphs using gnuplot. I was wondering if there was a mechanism for storing the gnuplot files somewhere on Wikipedia/Wikimedia so other wikipedians could easily regenerate the graphs in future with new data? Loweredtone (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

1992 Mail/Mirror
The 1992 numbers for the Mail and the Mirror are exactly the same, which suggests to me that at least one of them is wrong, probably the Mirror, which is about a million off its trend line. Luwilt (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

The Sun on Sunday
I know it's only recently launched, but shouldn't The Sun on Sunday be added to the tables? I'd do it myself if I had the figures to reference. Digifiend (talk) 23:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of newspapers in the United Kingdom by circulation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120310112424/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48913&c=1 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48913&c=1
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mmc.gov.uk/rep_pub/reports/1985/fulltext/190c02.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120310112424/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48913&c=1 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48913&c=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Backwards Tables
Hi all - is there a reason the tables all read right to left instead of left to right by ascending year? This feels wrong to me, indeed I read the table incorrectly as an increase in newspaper circulation over time, until I thought 'that can't be right...' and checked the headings. Surely they ought to increase in date as you go rightward? An argument could be made that you want to see the most recent, and most important figure first, but I would argue this is not an issue as it's already broken into smaller 10-year chunks the data is in small enough tables for this to not be a factor.

I didn't want to just go ahead and change it if there was some reason for doing it this way? Please enlighten me. Icecold.trashcan (talk) 10:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)