Talk:List of office-holders

Article listed on WP:VFD Jul 18 to Jul 24 2004, consensus was to redirect. Discussion:

This list is so vague in its meaning I think the parameters of what can be listed here are much too wide apart. I mean, I'm an office-holder in at least two senses of the word, as an employee of a local government organisation and as the trustee of a charity; do I get to go on this list? -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 22:05, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

STRONG keep! This is very useful information. This used to be at List of incumbents, but it got moved, I don't know why, but whatever the title, DO NOT delete this info. RickK 22:35, Jul 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * But there are only two entries in this list? I'm having trouble understanding why you think it's so important.  --Ardonik 01:18, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Far too vague. Delete.  Exploding Boy 02:22, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Oh, my bad. I confused it with Lists of office-holders, into which this article should be merged.  RickK 04:22, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * The only two entries on this list are already included with that other one, so I change my nomination (above) to redirect -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 17:47, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * NO!!!!!! DO NOT DELETE THIS ARTICLE!!!! -- Patricknoddy 16:39 Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Why not? If the info is already on another list, I'd vote to redirect this. - Lucky 6.9 22:04, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect, redundant. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 03:03, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

End archived discussion