Talk:List of remastering software

Mac
Is it worth noting the Mac installer, it lets you pick out what you want. E.g, printer drivers, Rosetta, Quicktime 7, at least another ten things. 86.139.154.48 (talk) 13:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Removals
This crap is why people are running away from Wikipedia (it's certainly why I no longer bother to log in). You're throwing bureaucracy (poorly justified, I might add) at editors in order to protect your little pet article. The listed links were just fine; WP:NOTDIR doesn't apply because this is a list page and those pieces of software were completely relevant. It would be one thing if this was the "Remastering software" page, but there's no reason a list of remastering software should omit items simply because they have no article. If you're really worried, go make one yourself. I'm reverting this crap. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd like to add that WP:SNOW is relevant in intent here, but nobody cares about it anymore here, anyway. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * First, it is Fleet Command, not Fleet Commander. Second, WP:STANDALONE and WP:LINKFARM specifically prohibits external links in standalone lists. Third, WP:SNOW does not apply here. The only thing that applies here is that you are spamming and insulting us all; if you do not stop, you might be blocked from editing. Fleet Command (talk) 06:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, trying to improve an article that you keep shortening is spamming and calling you out is flaming. Oh, but feel free to try to get a block on an entire campus IP because one person disagreed with you; I'd love to see you try. Maybe you should make some articles on those links instead of blanking everything? They're no more or less relevant than the other pieces of software, meaning they're encyclopedic and a good editor would just make articles out of them. Also, since you made the first revert, you'll trigger 3RR (WP:EW) pretty soon. You know, if you really want to go down the "stickler for rules" instead of "use some common sense" road. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * While I do agree these links are unhelpful (not notable), FleetCommand should not be canvassing other editors to support his viewpoint.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:10, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll let it go if others think they're not notable (though I think that if nLite is notable, the spiritual successors should be notable as well). I would encourage someone to add articles for the links at some point. The history revision with the links included is if anybody wishes to add articles for any of them. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, you are badly wrong on all accounts. First, notability is not inherited. Second, not every item that has an article is automatically notable; that means if the existing articles or the articles that you create later are not notable, they will be deleted; subsequently their links will be removed from this list. Third, Notability requires verifiable evidence. So do you have proof that what you think is notable is actually notable? Fleet Command (talk) 07:55, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In fact, I consider most remastering software to be not notable due to the lack of usage of the term online and the scant use of such tools.Jasper Deng (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of remastering software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051229025251/http://www.garfio.org.ar/ to http://www.garfio.org.ar/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Common name
I've started a discussion about a possibly more widely used WP:COMMONNAME at Talk:Software_remastering --PaulT2022 (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)