Talk:List of schools in Nepal

This page is in dire need of improvement
Schools are arranged without any order, by amateurs and people who have no idea about what Wikipedia is supposed to be. I suggest arranging them in alphabetic order rather than this jumble of names and locations. Similarly childish entries have to be corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.52.246.37 (talk) 05:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you. Noxboy (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Shree Tribhuvan Higher Secondary School
location बांसगढि नगरपालिका

Depu Kada (talk) 04:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Shree Tribhuvan Higher Secondary School
location बांसगढि नगरपालिका

Depu Kada (talk) 04:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

look below
Please improve this Page by providing references and use clear grammatically correct fonts and use  in places... Noxboy (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Related list of schools in Rupandehi
See List of secondary schools of Rupandehi district in 2015. FYI, Unscintillating (talk) 22:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of schools in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150628230228/http://everestlist.org/top-higher-secondary-schools-nepal/ to http://everestlist.org/top-higher-secondary-schools-nepal
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402135943/http://everestlist.org/top-higher-secondary-schools-nepal/ to http://everestlist.org/top-higher-secondary-schools-nepal/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Inclusion criteria
As stated at Stand-alone lists, Notability and Manual of Style/Lists:- This list fails most of these requirements in that:-
 * 1) All lists must have clearly defined inclusion criteria
 * 2) Every entry should meet the notability criteria for its own article.  Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the list, and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future.  This prevents indiscriminate lists, and prevents individual lists from being too large to be useful to readers.
 * 3) Editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.
 * 4) All list entries must follow Wikipedia's core content policies of Verifiability (by citing reliable sources as references), No original research, and Neutral point of view
 * There are no clearly defined inclusion criteria
 * Most of the entries are not "verifiably a member of the list" in that they have neither an article nor a reference
 * As per the above rules, all redlinks, without a citation, should be removed
 * Redlinks with a citation, should only remain if it is "reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming". (although how this can/should be assessed is unclear)
 * Personally, I would like to "limit the list to entries with a Wikipedia articles", and delete all redlinks - as point 3 above and most other similar lists - but that is a matter for consensus.
 * I invite comments on the elimination of all redlinks, but will commence removing redlinks, without citations, shortly. - Arjayay (talk) 09:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * How about "secondary schools" supported by reliable sources? Article can be split to regions if it becomes too large. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)