Talk:List of science fiction podcasts

Appeal
Hello, thank you for reviewing my draft. I wasn't expecting such a quick response and appreciate the promptness (I hadn't even finished filling out the table yet). In regards to your assessment I'd like to point out that there is already a category for science fiction podcasts, Category:Science fiction podcasts, but that lists and categories are not duplicative (WP:NOTDUPE) and have quite a few advantages to categories (WP:AOAL). It also appears to be common practice to create lists of podcasts based on genre (Category:Podcasting lists), and there are quite a few comparable examples in other fields of audio production such as List of rock albums and Category:Rock albums as well as List of radio comedies and Category:Radio comedy. I would think that this list meets the requirements of WP:LISTN and WP:SALAT in that it clearly demonstrates WP:GNG and is not too broad or too narrow of a topic. I believe that most of the podcasts on the list would meet the selection criteria as well (WP:LISTCRITERIA), although I would be open to removing any that you don't believe meet the necessary requirements. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello. When reviewing it, my logic was that there was no List of Crime Podcasts, when there was a Category for it. I see what you mean now, the Crime Podcasts category was the only thing I tested to see if there was a category for it.
 * I'm not sure what the next step is here. Should I just resubmit the draft or should I provide further and more specific reasoning as to why this list in particular is worth creating? Should I remove any podcasts from the list that might not meet WP:LISTCRITERIA or do you think a more thorough WP:SALLEAD would be appropriate? I think I'll start with WP:SALLEAD for now. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * . I was saying I agree with your assessment and then explained my previous logic for declining it. Noah   💬  17:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, so should I resubmit it or do you do something to push it through the review process? If you're not the one reviewing it the second time do you think it would be worth providing further reasoning for the next reviewer? TipsyElephant (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I can submit it and accept it. Everything looks fine to me. Noah   💬  18:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)