Talk:List of spider common names

linking of describers
describer links are totally ambiguous the way they are given here. they should be removed, and every distinct describer be linked once and only once. --Sarefo 03:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ok, i changed that, but i think the list still needs work. maybe the species should be grouped according to family? Also, I'm not sure that the describer should be in the list. And i think maybe this list should not be in the main wikipedia at all, but maybe as a work list in the WP:SPI internal pages? --Sarefo 04:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't think we need the authorities at all here, so I've removed them. I've also updated the scientific names, as quite a few have changed since 2006. There's an issue with sourcing, though: any names not from the general source given should really be separately referenced. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on List of spider common names. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060927170756/http://www.americanarachnology.org/acn5.pdf to http://www.americanarachnology.org/acn5.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)