Talk:List of subtribes and genera of Bambuseae

Misnamed article
This article isn't a discussion of the taxonomy of the tribe Bambuseae (its history, rationale, development, etc.) but a list of the subdivisions (subtribes) of the Bambuseae. For consistency with other such articles, it should be moved to something like "List of subtribes of Bambuseae" or "List of subtaxa of Bambuseae". Peter coxhead (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Support per nominator's rationale. Would prefer "List of subtribes of Bambuseae", since subtaxa would include other ranks such as species. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: since it goes down to genera, list of subtribes isn't accurate; it's a list of bamboo genera, ordered alphabetically within subtribe. Lavateraguy (talk) 23:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: "List of subtribes and genera of Bambuseae". (I notified the creator of this article of this discussion.) FloraWilde (talk) 01:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Suggest deletion
This page consists of an inaccurate, unsourced list of subtribes and genera. The page Bambuseae does include sourced and accurate listing of subtribes and genera. Given that this page is wrong and redundant, I suggest that it be removed. Note that not all links to this page would need shifting to Bambuseae - e.g. the link from Phyllostachys rubromarginata should be removed (or changed to Arundinarieae) since Phyllostachys is no longer considered in Bambuseae. Mozzy66 (talk) 04:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I think the page should become a redirect to Bambuseae, but as noted above, the links need fixing first. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I believed I've fixed those links, so I think it would be ready for a redirect. Do I just replace the content of this page with the redirect? Thanks, Mozzy66 (talk) 04:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)