Talk:List of supertall skyscrapers

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of supertall skyscrapers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612111832/http://www.sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20100608/5075314813725948178.htm to http://www.sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20100608/5075314813725948178.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Why are there incomplete skyscrapers on this list
@Robynthehode I'm not talking about buildings that are near completion. I know the story with these Chinese skyscrapers. They are not near completion. Particularly, Golden Finance 117 & Wuhan Greenland Center. If no one objects, I will remove them.  Itrytohelp 32  (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

What happened with the graphs?
They all look weird now, and I have no idea how to fix it. If anyone has the time to, can they please? Thank you <3 --: 125.59.226.79 (talk) 09:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the problem with the table is fixed now.--Kallichore (talk) 20:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Burj Khalifa is "supertall"?
This list gives a definition of "supertall" as buildings from 300 to 600 meters tall, but the top of the list contains a "megatall" building. Why isn't this just called a list of all the buildings taller than 300m? That's what it is. I wouldn't want to remove the Burj Khalifa from the list, nor give it its own list of megatall buildings, which would be a list of one. Why do we call this a list of "supertall" buildings when that's not what it is? —MiguelMunoz (talk) 21:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Merge proposal
Support the proposal to merge Supertall building with this list, as it is nothing more than a definition. Klbrain (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

I also support the proposal. I would go further - we should overhaul our entire handling of very tall buildings, to move away from boosterism and jargon like 'megatall'. A lot of the sources for the definitions we currently apply are not independent, but rather come from organisations with a vested interest in hyping up skyscrapers. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

WTC Towers/Destroyed Supertall Towers
The original World Trade Center towers were supertall towers, shouldn’t they be included on this list? Jeremy099 (talk) 01:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)