Talk:List of trade unions in the Singareni coal fields

Removed prod tag
I removed the prod tag. Although the article can be improved and referenced, the subject is notable. This is not "a certain coal field" as stated in prod nomination, but an area of 59 separate mines in three districts (http://books.google.com/books?id=Rh4TOzv2toMC&pg=PA9 ). http://books.google.com/books?id=Rh4TOzv2toMC provides a good basis for referencing the article. --Soman (talk) 00:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The Singareni coal fields are notable, and there is an article about them. But that doesn't mean there should be a list of trade unions for it. I do not see any similar articles like 'List of trade unions at General Motors' or 'List of trade unions in Peruvian copper mines'. Do you agree?
 * I can also put it in AfD and see what other editors have to say about it. What do you think? MakeSense64 (talk) 06:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I will try to improve referencing and wikify the article somewhat shortly, and respond at the AfD. As per the question, yes I would say that GM or Peruvian mining might very well have such lists, in case there have been a rather large number of unions there. --Soman (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of trade unions in the Singareni coal fields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001134919/http://www.cpimlnd.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=250 to http://www.cpimlnd.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=250

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:45, 23 May 2017 (UTC)