Talk:List of yacht support vessels by length

New table
An "Under construction" table? How would that even be reasonably tracked and updated? What projects get added? From what companies? This isn't like a national navy table where gov't reporting on public ships is required. This just seems superfluous to me. Why not wait and add completed vessels to the main table? (jmho) - wolf  17:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Anything...? - wolf  17:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * So far I've only added vessels that have been announced to be under construction. I don't see a reason for not putting it there. In my eyes it is not a table for concepts or other kind of early stage projects, only when it is officialy announced, it can be added here. - User:102Legobrick 10:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC+1)
 * Fair enough - wolf  18:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Article links
I see some ship "Names" link to an article and some aren't linked at all, but some link to image pages...(?) is that intentional? - wolf  17:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The links I made to image pages is to give an idea of what the support vessel looks like if it doesn't have its own article, like for example Fulk Al Salamah. I agree that it maybe is better indeed to remove the red links and re-link them when there is an article about the vessel. - [[User:102Legobrick] 09:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC+1)
 * why not just add the images to the table? (May have to double-check, but I don't think inline-linking to an image page like that is allowed.) Besides, having red-links is supposed to encourage article creation, and having an 'images' column may encourage the addition of more images as well. Just sayin'... - wolf  18:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Fair enough - User:102Legobrick 22:24, 14 December 2020 (UTC+1)

Not sure why you just copied my reply from above. It doesn't answer the question posed to to you here. - wolf  02:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)