Talk:Litigation funding

February 2008
The websites linked at the end of the "Litigation funding" entry should be removed because they are links to commercial services that would seem to violate the rule that any links should "not be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to ... links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product." So if this is why the link added today was disallowed then the rule should be applied uniformly and fairly.

Jtzalc (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

July 2013
I have attempted to improve citations and general formatStephenodowd (talk) 16:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit removed - NPOV issue?
I recently noticed that Vannin Capital were mentioned in the Litigation Funding (UK) page (URL below) alongside Harbour Litigation Funding. I also noticed that the article linked to Harbour's website, but not to Vannin Capital's.

When I added a link to Vannin Capital's website to help users navigate to Vannin's site, it was removed a couple of days later. I was curious as to the reason for this, when Harbour's link remained intact - this seems like bias towards one particular company which goes against Wikipedia's NPOV policy.

The page in question can be found here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_Funding_(UK)

Disclosure - I am a director of Vannin Capital's online marketing agency.

Mattfielding1980 (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Litigation funding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151121144155/https://www.invest4justice.com/how-to-succeed-in-crowdfunding-your-legal-claim/ to https://www.invest4justice.com/how-to-succeed-in-crowdfunding-your-legal-claim/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

New Info
Hi, I updated the page with some important information. Subject related specialized people were contacted and they agreed with the content. I am connected and interested personally in this update. If I need to fulfill any parameters please do let me know. Thanks DiamondDiana (talk) 22:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC) I read the discussion of merger and I'll try to prepare something after discussion with legal experts to see what is favorable. That's interesting. DiamondDiana (talk) 23:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Overlapping pages
The pages on Litigation funding (this one), Legal financing and Champerty overlap. Also 'litigation finance'. Room for at least one merger. 112.119.117.119 (talk) 07:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I think that this page is redundant with Legal financing, and it requires significant improvement. I suggest revising the existing content for accuracy and relevancy, then merging this article into legal financing. I don't think it's worth the effort to try to organize and update the case law or policy and regulation sections, and suggest removing them as part of a clean-up prior to merger, but with an eye toward whether any of the content should be added to the regional content of Legal financing. Arllaw (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I have done some clean-up, and have proposed merger. Discussion of the merger will occur on the destination talk page, Talk:Legal financing.