Talk:Little Goose Dam

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Little Goose Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051126062951/http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/dpn/dpn_project.asp?project_id=81 to http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/dpn/dpn_project.asp?project_id=81

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Geographies of Energy and Sustainability
— Assignment last updated by Juniper37 (talk) 18:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed Changes to Little Goose Dam Article
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

In the next couple weeks, I will be revising and editing this article for an energy and sustainability course project. I would appreciate any feedback on my proposed edits, which I will be working on in my user sandbox. So far, my planned changes to the article include:


 * Discussion of dam removal due to negative ecological impacts (salmon population, river flow, and Orca population)
 * Violations of Tribal Water Rights in the region, especially how it relates to the declining salmon population
 * How removing the dam could lead to more reliance on fossil fuels in the PNW region, as well as increase other types of renewable energy.


 * Adding a section header to organize all these changes. I had originally added a "Controversy" header but another editor removed it. Any suggestions for what to call it?
 * Updating and adding citations to the references section. So far I have 5 peer reviewed journals to add.

If you have any suggestions or sources you think would be helpful to me, please send them my way.

Thanks! Sandpiper798 (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The article is fairly short and so was not divided into sections yet. It also appears content was added without regard to a sensible arrangement. When adding content, please think about how it fits in rather than assuming a new section is needed. Pensacola Dam is an example of a Good Article that had similar concerns to the content you would like to add. Feel free to rearranged content if it makes it better narrative for the reader. Tiny sections are a bit silly but some of your proposed content might warrant a subsection as you can see in the example of Pensacola Dam. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. 〜 Adflatuss  •  talk  02:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)