Talk:Little Green Men (The X-Files)

Fair use rationale for Image:Little Green Men 2x01.jpg
Image:Little Green Men 2x01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Praise
This is not a request (kind of, actually, though not really) but more of a thanks to the one(s) who wrote the Plot summary for this and other X-files related articles. I often read about movies that people tell me about, and when I go to watch them, I realise that my experience has been ruined by reading the plot summaries here on Wikipedia. Unlike these "regular" articles, the X-files plot summaries seem to be less spoiling as it doesn't really reveal any important plot values. Graditude from my behalf.

And a minor request; could we keep it so in the future? Or perhaps have two plot summaries; one visible not spoiling the plot for the reader/viewer, and perhaps a dropdown section with a full plot-spoiling summary. Just a thought - and again, thank you. 80.62.83.195 (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)