Talk:Little Grill Collective

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Little Grill Collective. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://ourcommunityplace.org/media/newsletters/Newsletter_2012_February.pdf
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20131026154326/http://www.nodepression.com/profiles/blogs/interview-ketch-critter-morgan-of-old-crow-medicine-show-discuss to http://www.nodepression.com/profiles/blogs/interview-ketch-critter-morgan-of-old-crow-medicine-show-discuss
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100713192449/http://www.andyfriedman.net/about.html to http://andyfriedman.net/about.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Suspicion of undisclosed paid editing
, you removed the UPE maintenance template, however you did not provide any explanation why you believe the template is incorrect one or any reasonable justification supportingWP:WTRMT. The user did not disclose their COI, yet their edit pattern at this article, related articles, as well as non-related articles are quite indicative of client involved public relations editing. Graywalls (talk) 07:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * You haven't given any actual evidence of paid editing and your conduct here has been to assume bad faith with regards to them not only having a COI, but being paid. Writing in a somewhat poor manner doesn't mean someone is paid. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 07:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * , this is why the UPE template says "may have been", which is comparable to reasonable suspicion rather than "it has been proven that". Editing over the same article over a long period of time, editing pages directly related to over a long term along with the use of flimsy primary sources, introducing undue contents. If each item mentioned was a strand, it doesn't support the supposition, but these strands put together establishes reasonable suspicion of public relations editing. Graywalls (talk) 08:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)