Talk:Little Rock campaign

Confederate orbat
- should we even have that regimental-level orbat at all? It's a bit unbalanced to only have the CSA one, and it's largely unsourced. None of the secondary sources I consulted for this article provide this information at all. I guess we could try to find this information in the Official Records but I'm not sure how relevant it is to include this level of information when most units especially for the CSA saw little action. It also causes some difficulties with the GA status for this article to have all that largely unsourced. Hog Farm Talk 23:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * , I was just trying to cope with the fact we had a stand alone article for just the Confederate orbat, but no Union orbat, which doesn't really make sense with the new WP:ORBAT naming convention. I'm open to whatever makes the most sense, though. Ideally, if the orbat could be sourced, a Union one could be created, and then spunout into Little Rock campaign order of battle. There is also Battle of Bayou Fourche order of battle, which is largely overlapping and perhaps redundant. So not sure what to do. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, we're better off creating a single Little Rock campaign order of battle with both sides' orders. Bayou Fourche is going to be redundant to the main campaign one, so I'd just redirect it to the campaign one once that's up and running. The Bayou Fourche one is probably accurate for both sides for the campaign, but I'd need to do some digging in the ORs to verify that and I'm not sure when I'll have time. Hog Farm Talk 00:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)