Talk:Little Things (One Direction song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 11:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Info box
 * Use the length template, like on "I Will Be"
 * ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Put folk before pop, as f is before p
 * Put the music video link as an External link in its own section at the bottom of the article

✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ❌; When comes to digital sales of singles, a certification denotes a number of sales. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Lead
 * "released in November 2012" → Say it was released on 11 November 2012 in its own sentence at the end of the para
 * "with the quintet" → A lot of people won't know what this is, best to just say the band or One Direction
 * shipments, not sales. See here.
 * No, some countries are sales, some are shipments. Hence why I attached the link for you. —  AARON  &bull; TALK

✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * "The vocal ensemble" → One Direction. Ensemble is more for clothing.


 * Critical response
 * This section heavily focuses on the use of quotations. Several need to be in your own words or a mix of the two.
 * I'll see what I can do. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Live performances
 * I made some little edits
 * Why did you remove UK from The X Factor; its just confusing now. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅; all peaks where in 2012.. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Weekly charts
 * The Chart column needs the shading, like the Certification table
 * 2012 peaks and 2013 peaks should be in separate tables.

✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ❌ because it is a generic template. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ removed country as well; copy paste from 1D disco, where countries are always added. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Partly ✅; italics &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Partly ✅; delinked ✅ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Certifications
 * The box should resemble this one
 * References
 * FN2: Captial FM should not be in italics
 * FN4: MTV News should not be in italics and the publisher is Viacom
 * FN5: Don't SHOUT
 * FN11: Has no publisher
 * FN12: About.com should not be in italics
 * FN13: Same as FN4 above and should not be linked as this is the second mention
 * FN14: Has no publisher
 * FN16: BBC should not be in italics
 * FN17: Has no publisher
 * FN18: Has no publisher
 * FN19: Has no publisher
 * FN20: Has no publisher
 * FN21: Allmusic should not be in italics
 * FN24: Don't SHOUT
 * FN45: Has no work parameter
 * FN46: Allmusic should not be in italics
 * FN48: Same as FN4. Why is the country suddenly being used?
 * FN49: WP:TWITTER, remove as it is self published.
 * FN51: Same as FN48
 * FN52: Has no publisher
 * FN54: Has no title, Idolator should not be in italics, and the publisher is missing
 * FN56: Has no publisher and should not be linked as it already is in FN52
 * FN58: Has no publisher
 * FN59: Has no publisher
 * FN60: same as FN2

Publishers are needed to meet FA not GA; so I'm not adding them. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * No, you can get away without having a work parameter if it is unknown, but not for publishers. All references, regardless of what it is for, need a publisher. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   22:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

On hold for 7 days. Please pay attention to your reference formatting in the future. — AARON  &bull; TALK   17:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Status
 * Thanks for reviewing, Aaron! &mdash; Robin   (talk)  22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * OMFG!!!!!! I thought I had already saved the adjustments to the article before responding to your posts; I closed the tab without saving all the adjustments, thinking it was an old version of article I had left open. I'll be back 2morrow............ &mdash; Robin   (talk)  23:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

I've done everything you want, I guess. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  14:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You haven't changed sales to shipments. All US certifications are according to shipments only. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   16:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * But the way I have written it now doesn't indicate that the RIAA denotes its sales or shipments. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  16:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * But that's not the point. It's incorrect. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   16:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Done &mdash; Robin   (talk)  16:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually Australia is also shipments. New Zealand is okay though, they base certifications on sales. This is a handy page to know. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   16:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Did the Aussie cert as well. &mdash; Robin   (talk)  16:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Passing. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   16:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)