Talk:Liturgiam authenticam

[Untitled]
Apart from the short initial paragraph, this article says nothing whatever about Liturgiam Authenticam. Lima (talk) 14:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liturgiam authenticam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090308120509/http://www.bisdomoudtshoorn.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=51 to http://www.bisdomoudtshoorn.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=51

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Liturgiam Authenticam is the accusative case... Why?
Why not just write Liturgia Authentica as a title? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.205.137.110 (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It is the incipit, the first sentence is "Liturgiam authenticam, e viva et vetustissima spirituali traditione Ecclesiae exortam, valde optavit Sacrosanctum Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum Secundum studiose custodire atque ingenio variorum populorum pastorali cum sapientia accommodare, ita ut fideles in plena, conscia et actuosa participatione sacrarum actionum, praecipue in Sacramentorum celebratione, uberem fontem gratiarum et facultatem se continenter formandi ad mysterium christianum invenirent." Veverve (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)