Talk:Live A Live/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Judgesurreal777 (talk · contribs) 02:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The whole article has been replaced, and any contributions I ever made are effectively replaced, so I’ll take this article! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

This is going to be simple;
 * I think the into should include a sentence on how people have asked for a remake, or how the creator would be open to it. There’s enough discussion in the article about it to warrant this I believe.
 * Added.
 * Add alt text for the images.
 * Added.
 * Are we allowed to use the fan names of the characters? I think we need official confirmation that that is allowed.
 * I used them and the chapter titles after checking on the JP wikipedia page, and finding that the names are practically identical. The fan translation here is very literally a translation, rather than a localization. And there isn't another clear source.
 * Finally, reception, is there any more? It’s relatively short compared to the rest of the article.
 * That's all there is.

And that should do it! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I've addressed everything. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Very nice, I will pass it. My FA advice is continue to look for more, especially reception, and great work once again!