Talk:Live Intrusion

Untitled
Will this be coming out on DVD anytime soon?

Fair use rationale for Image:Slayer-LiveIntrusion.jpg
Image:Slayer-LiveIntrusion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

GA-Class?
This article doesn't look like it has enough content for even a B-Class assessment. If that's all there is to cover then this article belongs in the category of articles that aren't meant to be GA-Class. I'd like to discuss this here and will probably start a reassessment later, because we need to uphold the standard of GA class articles and not let it atrophy. An article can be good and informative without the green dot. Regards Hekerui (talk) 19:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This is virtually all the information on this DVD. However, the GA criteria is:


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):(paragraph form) b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects) —It covers its conception, reception, track listing, and personnel, all that is required per WP:MOSALBUM) b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Besides there are a lot of smaller articles that have passed as GA, (look at History GAs, Natural sciences GAs, even Arts GAs). Crowz  RSA  20:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. However, if there's not a lot of sources, thats not the editors problem. As long as the article is well written, and well above a Start-Class, then it should pass. AJona1992 (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * "not the editors problem" - we're not here to make editors feel good, and some articles just aren't cut out for a GA assessment. This is a two paragraph article, not a GA-Class work. WP:MOSALBUM is part of a wikiproject, not guideline, and nowhere does it mention that an article with almost no content should become GA. Hekerui (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Besides there are a lot of smaller articles that have passed as GA, (look at History GAs, Natural sciences GAs, even Arts GAs). Crowz  RSA  20:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. However, if there's not a lot of sources, thats not the editors problem. As long as the article is well written, and well above a Start-Class, then it should pass. AJona1992 (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * "not the editors problem" - we're not here to make editors feel good, and some articles just aren't cut out for a GA assessment. This is a two paragraph article, not a GA-Class work. WP:MOSALBUM is part of a wikiproject, not guideline, and nowhere does it mention that an article with almost no content should become GA. Hekerui (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Live Intrusion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305162623/http://mog.com/blog_post/content/723/2195036 to http://mog.com/blog_post/content/723/2195036
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100802040208/http://www.slayer.net/us/news/three-classic-slayer-concert-titles-be-released-dvd to http://www.slayer.net/us/news/three-classic-slayer-concert-titles-be-released-dvd
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100815080449/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=142825 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=142825

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)