Talk:LiveonRelease

Untitled
Article listed on WP:VFD Jul 20 to Jul 26 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:

A band. I believe it's a vanity page. Could be wrong. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:14, 2004 Jul 20 (UTC)
 * Definitely a vanity page and kiddie-wiki to boot. Delete one way or another. - Lucky 6.9 17:16, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: advertising. Geogre 21:15, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Send to clean up. If it comes back here, though, there is probably insufficient interest to make it viable. Geogre 18:15, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * spend more time on writing skills, kids! I detect a c&p from this page: http://www.bifnaked.ca/lor/bio.htm#bio . The website site is reasonably substantial. Can someone more in tune with the Canadian girlrock scene than I am comment? Though I must say "Multiple passes through the Canadian tundra" as a tour description doesn't inspire notabilty. Abstain; if notable, cleanup. Ianb 21:31, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep following rewrite Ianb 18:54, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * On inspection, site does seem solid (sorry, I didn't click on "bifnaked.com" because I was at work). Keep if cleaned up and proven notable, delete otherwise. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 22:07, 2004 Jul 20 (UTC)
 * Unlikely as it seems, they're real. My roommate has their CD, and the song I'm afraid of Britney Spears is actually pretty good (chorus: "I'm afraid of Britney Spears/and Christina Aguilara").  They were also getting played on the radio for a while.  Keep.  Exploding Boy 07:59, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but please clean up. It should not IMO be necessary to list it on cleanup, surely someone here can wikify and expand it to the more-than-adequate stub level at least. It does need work. Andrewa 10:00, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, just needs some cleanup, and I believe their name is really spelled "LiveonRelease". They are notable enough to have four reasonably popular singles in Canada, which is more than can be said for some other bands we have articles on. Adam Bishop 18:22, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * There, I've now moved it to LiveonRelease and cleaned it up into a stub. The previous version was a copyvio too. All is well :) Adam Bishop 18:38, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * All is indeed well. The original really did look like vanity, but this looks like an encyclopedia article.  Keep rewrite. - Lucky 6.9 18:48, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

End archived discussion