Talk:Liverpool 0–2 Arsenal (1989)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

I may as well take a look at this one too while I am at it.....


 *  It was a match between the top two teams in the First Division, and the clubs were close enough on points for the match to act as a decider for the championship. - would append "the top two teams in the First Division" onto the previous sentence and reword the second so it was just " the clubs were close enough on points for the match to act as a decider for the championship" ...too many "match" es around the beginning.


 * ' 'In unprecedented circumstances'' - a bit fluffy and doesn't add anything. One could argue that any match is "unprecedented circumstances"...just maybe not that interesting...


 * link "stoppage time" in the lead.

The rest of it reads well, a ripping yarn! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * thanks for taking a look at this, have made adjustments. Lemonade51 (talk) 10:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Earwig's copyvio tool is clear

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: -overall a nifty little article and engaging read, with a nice legacy that really highlights its place in history. well done! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)