Talk:Lizzie Cundy

Controversial statement
"She is often called upon to defend the WAGs lifestyle despite habitually depending on others for her own maintenance."

I can see why independent sources are required. This statement is inflammatory and subjective and should be removed if no objective evidence is provided. --TimJO (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Agree. Unsourced, not verifiable and inflammatory. Removed as per BLP guidelines. NoisyJinx (talk) 10:26, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Shocking Standard
What a truly awful article. An obviously cut and pasted piece no doubt from Lizzie or Lizzie's press agent. Why does every sentence start "Lizzie... " Creepy. This is what's wrong with wikipedia, you've got over zealous editors deleting articles that have years of editing by hundreds of contributors because on a whim they feel they sound like a press release, when on the other hand a truly awful article like this stays with no mention. I only came to this article to see who the leathery old rent-a-mouth i was seeing on sky news was, and on the evidence of this article, she is obviously a complete nobody, who is likely not worthy of wikipedia mention.

78.150.28.248 (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Agree with the last post.
This page survives where other far more worthy pages suffer, and then when someone like me actually tries to add to it - in my case, adding that she is married to a former Premier League footballer (I would have thought that was the entire point of the 'Personal Life' section but apparently that was reserved for some vacuous mention of her political preference), you revert it without explanation and send me a message. Unacceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.76.98.239 (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Date of birth?
Somebody put it in 1964 births category, with no source; a recent edit (again without sourcing) claimed a specific 1968 date; and the article in the Mail implies a 1972 birthdate! -- Orange Mike  |   Talk  20:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If The Mail is the only source provided then we can go with that (or just not add a birth date if anyone is still contesting it). If the person engaged in an edit-war trying to add 1968 as the birth date wishes to contribute to a consensus, please explain where the date comes from as we need a reliable source for it to be considered. Fæ (talk) 09:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I left a message on the editors talkpage explaining about reliable sources and verifiability after he told me he went to school with her, Hopefully that'll be the end of it. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Alas, he or she wouldn't listen and had to be blocked. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Worthy of Wiki?
I fail to see why this minor presenter more famed by the association of marriage to a former premier league footballer has her own page. The category of woman's writing that makes here eligible is questionable, she writes a very occasional single column, two short paragraph articles for the Daily Express. Most work and credits mentioned are not noteworthy. She is mostly known for travelling abroad with her own photographer to take photos of her to sell to the Daily Mail. How do we start the process to remove her from Wiki, I feel it needs someone more experienced that myself to lead this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeenFishing (talk • contribs) 11:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * To propose the article for deletion put Your reason here at the top of the page. If there are no objections within a week, it will be deleted. If the template is removed within that week, you will need to follow the articles for deletion process.-- Laun chba ller 12:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)