Talk:Llibre del Repartiment (Valencia)

Multiple issues
I came from another article regarding the [|Valencian language controversy] and to my surprise found that ALL of the sources referenced here are higly biased, coming from those affiliated with "Blaverism" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaverism). Although most of its content is accurate, there are subtle parts that are deliberately manipulated (the ones I've labeled), mostly concerning to figures, numbers and proportions that do not correspond to the currently accepted thesis by the historian world. Antonio Ubieto and Leopoldo Peñarroja are the two sources that this community use to cite as their mainly support to their thesis, not being recognized by the academic world. They even cite one of their pages (blog of Teresa Puerto), probably a self reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.43.206.58 (talk) 18:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)