Talk:Loading gauge

Parked here pending translation from Spanish
es:Gálibo ferroviario Parked here pending translation from Spanish. ]] Peter Horn User talk 21:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 23:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Added translation from Google translate.

Loading gauge [1] Vehicle [2] Maximum construction profile of rolling stock [3] Sum of the vehicle's displacements and its interaction with the infrastructure [4] Reference contour [5] Obstacle implantation gauge [6] Infrastructure [a] Lower part gauge [b] Upper part gauge [c] Pantograph gauge]] Peter Horn User talk 23:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

An invitation to comment
I invite all who may be interested to weigh in at Talk:Boxcar Peter Horn User talk 17:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

A spurious AAR plate-D?
According to this dead AAR Plate-D does not exist and the bottom of AAR Plate-E is $2 3/4$ inches ATR. Peter Horn User talk 22:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * See Loading gauge Peter Horn User talk 22:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Any one interested see also what is the difference? and make a comment there. Peter Horn User talk 15:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 00:54, 19 May 2023 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 01:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Eritrean loading gauge
Talk:Loading gauge/Archive 1 . Hello, Why did you call the file loading gauge instead of structure gauge? What is it? I don't have my Jane's 1970 edition handy. Peter Horn User talk 04:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, I'm patiently waiting for a clarification. Peter Horn User talk 13:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Irish Gauge
Loading gauge Ireland has a maximum height of 4830 mm and a maximum width of 3110 mm. Peter Horn User talk 01:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * There are. Go to the actual file by pressing "2022 network statement", and in the 148-page pdf file there is a table of contents with loading gauge described in appendix 3 on page 67. Unfortunately scanned from paper with bad quality with is bad for an official regulatory document.--Libb (talk) 05:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Glasgow tunnel smaller than the minimum diameter agreed upon?
Glasgow tunnel smaller than previously stated minimum diameter agreed upon, mistake in text or what's reason for not honoring it?

In the section "Tube lines", it says '"The evidence submitted to the Committee on the question of the diameter of the underground tubes containing the railways has been distinctly in favour of a minimum diameter of 11 ft 6 in (3.51 m)". After that, all tube lines were at least that size' but then the Glasgow Tunnel is listed in the following list with 3.35m diameter, which is less than the agreed upon 3.51m minimum. Is this a mistake or is it worded confusingly? 2003:E8:D70B:7799:75C3:78C2:F13F:D393 (talk) 16:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The question is, whether the Comittee's findings were binding or not. If so, did they apply only to standard-gauge railways, or to all railways? -- Red rose64 &#x1F98C; (talk) 20:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)