Talk:Loai Deeb

Contested deletion
Dear sir/madam hope you are doing well ! This page should not be speedily deleted because... (all information witch was written have a reference and all article depend on real facts. i speak about public figure here for sure he have also criticism form other people witch i will write step by step.

i hope your understanding ) --Jehad.jaghoub (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (Is a public figure - has more than a million followers on Facebook and more than a million on Twitter Known human rights defender - writes daily about human rights violations Topic contains personal information - and information on what his work I do not see that the matter is it propaganda - and I would recommend that Wikipedia is as published subject) Norwawgv (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Is a public figure - has more than a million followers on Facebook and more than a million on Twitter Known human rights defender - writes daily about human rights violations Topic contains personal information - and information on what his work I do not see that the matter is it propaganda - and I would recommend that Wikipedia is as published subject) Norwawgv (talk) 23:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Criminal investigation - should be deleted post haste
This person is under criminal investigation on charges of money laundering and handling of stolen goods. The wikipage about this person also seems to be a deliberate effort to make him seem more legit, as he's neither a lawyer or a professor at the University of Oslo.

Infact his latest work experience is documented to be as a security guard and a delivery man.

His entry should be deleted hastily.

Nogaz (talk) 09:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't think speedy deletion would work here (we have specific criteria for that -- Criteria for speedy deletion). You can try, of course. This article will only end up getting deleted if it becomes apparent that this person is not notable (Notability (people)), other reasons are not sufficient for deletion (typically). If you think there's something wrong with the article's content then please feel free to edit it. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Pardon, I was unclear. In my understanding this article is in clear violation of at least "G3. Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes" and "G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion"Nogaz (talk) 12:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Well it's not obvious so before you tag it with a speedy deletion tag you should leave an explanation here, so the deleting admin can see what you mean. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)