Talk:Local Government Commission for England (1958–1967)

Discussion
The Times of September 6, 1962 mentions a proposal by the chairman of West Riding County Council to have a single Yorkshire County Council, noting that the population of Yorkshire minus county boroughs is less than Lancashire. Morwen - Talk 07:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

and December 15, 1965, has details of the provisional reports for Merseyside/SELNEC.

In SELNEC is proposes a "new county of nearly 500 square miles [...] and a population of more than 2,500,000". there would be nine boroughs within this


 * Manchester, with Manchester Airport
 * Salford, Eccles, Swinton and Pendlebury, Prestwich, Irlam, Worsley, Kearsley, Whitefield
 * Stretford, Urmston, Altrincham, Sale, Hale, Bowdon, Carrington and Partington
 * Stockport, Bredbury and Romiley, Cheadle and Gatley, Hazel Grove and Bramhall, Marple, Wilmslow, Alderley Edge and Disley
 * Ashton-under-Lyne, Dunkinfield, Hyde, Stalybridge, Mossley, Audenshaw, Droylsden, Longdendale, Denton, Denton, Tintwistle, Glossop, Chapel-en-le-Frith
 * Oldham, Chadderton, Crompton, Failsworth, Lees, Royston, Saddleworth
 * Rochdale, Heywood, Littleborough, Middleton, Milnrow, Wardle, Whitworth
 * Bury, Radcliffe, Whitefield, Tottington, Ramsbottom
 * Bolton, Farnworth, Horwich, Kearsley, Little Lever, Turton and Westhoughton

it doesn't recommend anything near so radical in Merseyside, recommendations include "the extension of Bootle county borough to take in Litherland, Crosby" and "creation of a new urban district based on Maghull".

Morwen - Talk 08:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

and October 27, 1965 has the draft proposals for the north-west:


 * Barrow-in-Furness to become non-county borough (strongly disliked by its council)
 * extensions to boundaries of Blackburn, Blackpool, Burnley, Carlisle, Chester, Preston, St Helens, Southport, Warrington, Wigan.

"suggestions that Westmorland - in population the second smallest English county - should be merged with Cumberland and the Furness area of Lancashire to form a county of "Cumbria" are ruled out". Interesting to note opposition to this proposal comes mainly from Westmorland not from Cumberland. Morwen - Talk 08:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

March 2, 1960 has the draft proposals for East Midlands and West Midlands. These are quite interesting


 * Huntingdonshire, Isle of Ely, Soke of Peterborough and Cambridge division to be joined to form a single new county of Cambridgeshire
 * except that Cambridge would constitute a county borough
 * Luton to be made a county borough
 * Stamford to be included in the new Cambridgeshire
 * Rutland to be abolished. Ketton Rural District -> Cambridgeshire, rest to Leicestershire
 * Royston, Hertfordshire also to Cambs
 * St Neots and area to Bedfordshire from Hunts/Cambs
 * extension of Leicester and Northampton CBs
 * Linslade transferred from Bucks to Beds

Black Country has proposals for county boroughs:
 * Dudley, with Brierley Hill, most of Sedgley
 * Smethwick with Halesowen, Oldbury and Rowley Regis
 * West Bromwich with Tipton and Wednesbury, most of Darleston
 * Wallsall, most of WIllenhall
 * Wolverhampton, Bilston, Wednesfield

Cosley to be split between Dudley/West Bromwich/Wolverhampton.


 * Solihull to become county borough
 * Stourbridge and Amblecote to be merged to form non-county borough in Worcestershrie
 * Alridge-Brownhills in Staffordshire

"special authority" to be set up to cover entire region


 * Burton upon Trent and Worcester to become non-county boroughs
 * extensions for Coventry and Stoke
 * "transfer to Staffordshire of a large part of Tamworth Rural District"

June 6, 1961 has the report on the revised proposals for WMids special review area: has a rather fantastic map showing the old borders vs the new Morwen - Talk 08:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * and not strictly related, but September 19, 1961 has a couple of new towns being proposed at Swynnerton and Woofferton, whcih never happened. Morwen - Talk 08:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

February 2, 1966, has a "How Local Government Areas Stand Today - Work of Discontinued Commission" - explaining what is going on with the proposals the commission did make. Burton upon Trent launched a High Court action to save itself, Worcester was abandoned. "decision not to amalgamate Rutland with Leicestershire announced in August 1963". Cheltenham demotion also abandoned. Morwen - Talk 09:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Why recommendations for reform were not acted on/delayed
Many recommendations were not acted upon. Tony Bryne (1994) notes the following as reasons for delays/no action in the period from 1945 up to 1965/74:


 * cost of reorganisation - there wasn't the money
 * pressure on legislative timetables
 * the war and reconstruction got in the way
 * general public were apathetic to reform
 * lack of consensus for alternative proposals (all met with some appeal or repugnance)
 * arguments over efficiency vs. democracy (large vs. small units)
 * Governments knew some areas of local government would be alienated by change and were reluctant to loose influence
 * Fears that changes to boundaries would affect party performance

I'm not sure where this could/should go but it might explain why so much effort was spent without much change. MRSC 15:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment added by anon IP
An anon IP added this to the "The Review process" section:

I presume this means the following:

Anyone have a copy to check? The dates in the existing table come from the Lonodon Gazette and press announcements in contemporary media. Lozleader (talk) 10:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Local Government Commission for England (1958–1967). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927075020/http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9918.html to http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9918.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927052620/http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9920.html to http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9920.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927052620/http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9920.html to http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9920.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927053117/http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9922.html to http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9922.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927053040/http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9924.html to http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9924.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927074333/http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9926.html to http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9926.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927053911/http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9928.html to http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopall/ref9928.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)