Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 19:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 19:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

General comments

 * "The USAF retired the F-117 in April 2008" but the article says August 2008.

Source review
No effort made to assess the quality of sources, as this is not required for GA.
 * fn 6: date?
 * changed source to full text and updated pub date to match full text source


 * fn 8: Is this the same as fn 6? As what is the UCI there for?
 * yes, repointed it to fn6


 * fn 9: Air and Space Power Journal is a jpournal? Should be in italics


 * fn 13: Is the only one where the journal is linked.
 * this is different journal from Air and Space Power. I could add Air and Space Power Journal to the sources? As far as I know neither way is standardized


 * fn 21, 89, 129, 152: Access date?
 * I did not add any of these sources so I am not sure what to do here? I suppose I could go into the history to find it? Maybe there is a bot for that?


 * fn 78: Cites a whole book. Move to the bibliography and provide a page number.


 * fn 83, 154: page number required


 * fn 112: Aerotech News and Review is a magazine? Should be in italics


 * fn 124, 152: Publisher?
 * Done I think


 * fn 128: Flight International is a magazine? Should be in italics


 * fn 135, 145: Title?


 * fn 138, 139: The Drive is a magazine? Should be in italics


 * fn 141: Merced Sun-Star is a newspaper? Should be in italics


 * Reference formatting is inconsistent - some use sfn templates and others do not
 * Ok, does that matter? Are there not bots to do stuff like that?


 * Alphabetic order: "Goodall" comes before "Gunston"

The MOS says that newspapers should have the location, unless it is already part of the title.
 * In further reading, should The World's Great Stealth and Reconnaissance Aircraft come before "Winchester"?
 * Because 'The' is before 'W' ? I don't think so.
 * Clark (1992) is the only reference with an OCLC
 * Ok, I don't know what to do about that.
 * Ok, are you referring to things like AeroTech News? I don't think that counts.


 * Started responding in line Czarking0 (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

References required

 * At end of F-117B section
 * First sentence of "nicknames"

Overall
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * Looks pretty good. Referencing needs improvement.


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * No major issues. Passing. References may require further cleanup if FAC is desired.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * No major issues. Passing. References may require further cleanup if FAC is desired.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * No major issues. Passing. References may require further cleanup if FAC is desired.
 * No major issues. Passing. References may require further cleanup if FAC is desired.