Talk:Lockheed XF-104 Starfighter/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * What makes Ejectionsite.com a reliable source? Is Kevin Coyne a noted expert on the subject (i.e., has his work been published in reliable sources elsewhere)?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The article is in great shape, excellent work! The only thing holding up promotion is whether Ejectionsite.com is a reliable source or not. Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Website has been removed, so passing for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The article is in great shape, excellent work! The only thing holding up promotion is whether Ejectionsite.com is a reliable source or not. Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Website has been removed, so passing for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Website has been removed, so passing for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)