Talk:Loeb's (department store)

owner requests deletion
db-g7 rationale=DeletionRationale}}

G7. Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author. (For redirects created as a result of a pagemove, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the pages prior to the move.) If the sole author blanks a page other than a userspace page or category page, this can be taken as a deletion request.

G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement. Text pages that contain copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license, where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained. For equivocal cases (such as where there is a dubious assertion of permission, or where free-content edits overlie the infringement) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willwl123 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I still don't understand exactly what parts of the article infringe on copyright. Can those parts be deleted without deleting the article?  By the way, it is helpful to 'sign' your comments here by adding 4 tildes ( ~ at the end!  :)   Wikipelli  Talk 13:15, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Privacy concerns regarding the compilation of this content that will not be discussed here. Technical reasons that might satisfy for now: The photos (copyright). Overall, the article is acting as a mirror site for the ongoing entity's website in search. In order to properly represent the article it should be reclassified as LOEB'S Inc. ( minus: department store) to represent the legal entity that is the basis for the historical discussion regarding the company's mergers, acquisitions, family ownership etc. Thank you. please delete.


 * How are these photos infringing on copyright? I'm the one that took them.. I assure you they are not. They were taken from a public street. If you have a problem with the name of the page, it is possible to rename it. As far as I can tell, the page is sourced and notable. The store is a big part of downtown Meridian, so it's historically important. Maybe if you explained some of the problems you have with the article in more detail, we could help you out more? Please don't blank the page anymore as you have done twice now. Wait until this discussion is settled.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Concerning the privacy issues you have stated, but unable to place here, you could place them privately by using a WP:OTRS request by clicking here. Exchanges are private and not viewable by anyone other than the volunteers handling the request. Calmer   Waters  15:49, 27 April 2010 (UTC)