Talk:Loenen-Kronenburg

Remerge
I consider that in writing
 * became the separate municipality of Loenen-Kronenburg

i've merely reworded
 * was split off in 1817, under the name "Loenen-Kronenburg"

so i take no responsibility for its accuracy (or lack), tho a tag would be justified. On the other hand,
 * it merged again into a single municipality "Loenen"

is simply nonsense (a single thing can merge into something that already exists, e.g. the single municipality, or two things can merge into an (implicitly new) thing), and i took that as license to assume, but only provisionally (hence the need for the fact tag), that what took place in the case of Loenen is what almost always takes less long-run effort in reasonably complex polities that try to minimize the number of important people who think they've been screwed in a change: namely, legal continuity coinciding with the name of the entity, specifically Loenen
 * retaining, in 1817, all its prerogatives and obligations that were not explicitly either abolished or transferred to LK, and
 * falling heir, in 1819, to those of LK that were not explicitly abolished along with LK.

Knowing that, rather than guessing it, is likely to require a substantial familiarity with Netherlands culture and language, and perhaps someone so equipped will check and provide (in place of the fact tag) verifiable evidence of the encyclopedically precise situation.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loenen-Kronenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220041404/http://www.knaw.nl/cfdata/publicaties/detail.cfm?boeken__ordernr=20061061 to http://www.knaw.nl/cfdata/publicaties/detail.cfm?boeken__ordernr=20061061

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)