Talk:Logistics management

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC) (Samsamtor (talk) 01:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)) The title is logistics management but content is logistics software. This page should be merge into other related topics

Moved section to logistics automationLbertolotti (talk) 14:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Merger proposal
@Joannes Vermorel @CorporateM @Ani Kuriakose @Ian Glossop @User:Pippin Bear @User:Snow Rise @User:TDJankins I propose that Logistics management be merged into Logistics. Lbertolotti (talk) 11:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I think this could definitely be merged into the Logistics page under one of the subheadings, however the intro to the Logistics page should probably be more general than it currently is as it's currently about Logistics Management. Also, we probably don't need the universities list.--TDJankins (talk) 02:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@TDJankins See if it is better now.Lbertolotti (talk) 15:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, looks better.--TDJankins (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)