Talk:Loham/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 21:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

GA Review on Hold

 * 1) Thank you very much for your efforts to contribute to Quality improvement on Wikipedia, it's really most appreciated !!!
 * 2) NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * 3) Suggestion: This suggestion is optional only, but I ask you to please at least read over the Good Article review instructions, and consider reviewing two to three (2-3) GA candidates from good articles nominations, for each one (1) that you nominate. Again, this is optional and a suggestion only, but please do familiarize yourself at least with how to review, and then think about it. Thank you. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Lingering language loss at Loham
I'm sorry but the entire article body text needs lots of work.

Just curious,, what is your level of language at Category:User en ?

Strongly suggest you find multiple copyeditors previously uninvolved with the article or topic to copyedit and improve syntax and diction.

Recommend you find people of language level Category:User en-N or Category:User en-5, or both.

Good luck,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Not GA at this time
Quite sorry to say that upon revisit after Seven Days, unfortunately, this article is not GA at this time.

I sincerely hope that the recommendations from the GA Review, above, will be helpful to editors in the future to further work on the Quality improvement process.

Here are my suggestions before trying for GA again:


 * 1) Request copy-edit at WP:GOCE
 * 2) Try to get Category:User en-N, Category:User en-5, or Category:User en-4 to copy-edit the article for writing quality and grammar.
 * 3) Go for another Peer Review. This time, specifically ask for help with the writing quality.
 * 4) While at Peer Review -- Post neutrally-worded-notices to the talk pages of relevant WikiProjects with a link to the Peer Review.
 * 5) While at Peer Review, try consulting for help from Peer review/volunteers from your relevant topic.

I hope that's helpful, and good luck,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)