Talk:Loket Castle

No Footnotes
No offence, but you're three days late. Could use your help once you're Czech. That'd be greatly appreciated !

Best regards, Krenakarore (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't get what "you're three days late" is supposed to mean, but I'd be pleased to help by checking the spelling of some Czech words etc., but I'm not going to add footnotes or something. That requires research and time that I won't invest into it. I just wonder why you don't add the footnotes with the sources when you just added the content. You might use this to avoid confusion in the future. Cheers--  LYKANTROP    ✉  17:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Loket
Dear friend, when I see there's sth missing here or there I provide it, instead of tagging the page and leave that missing thing yet to be done. A lotta people work on a certain article at the very same time over a period of days, weeks or months, so that every article is "always under construction". Your help is inestimable and I'd really like to work with you. Researching is sth that I enjoy doing 'cause I learn a lot from. As for the WP:Footnotes, I don't know what you mean. All citations are there and the so-called footnotes instantly appear on the respective Ref list.

Listen, there are a lotta pages about castles and chateaus that need to be expanded, diagramed (it's pretty much like a journal or magazine - when you align, resize the pics, move things about a bit so that the article looks better) so that everybody may have pleasure reading about it or even collecting a piece of information. It's not about creating an article, but about making it better ! You have the advantage of being Czech (my wife's czech and we live in Prague, do you ?) so, you can add content to an page by translating it from the corresponding Czech article. That's the case of Houska Castle - could you please?...:) !

As for the "you're three days late", that means that in three days Loket Castle was expanded from mere four lines to the way it loks today. I intend to add more content to the: "Loket, originally called Stein-Elbogen due to its rocky location..." section. You could check the article on the Cz-Wiki. That'd be wonderful ! Krenakarore (talk) 20:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * That still doesn't explain what am I late for. Anyway, I didn't intend to make disarray by tagging that article. All I'm talking about is, that there were, and still are, whole sections without footnotes thus they seem to be unsourced (i.e "During the rule of Sigismund of Luxemburg", parts of "During the rule of Jiří Popel of Lobkowicz" and "From the 18th century up to modern times", all subsections of "Sections of the castle"); so I just wanted to give a notice to the editor who just did the research. Nothing more.--  LYKANTROP    ✉  21:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Noted. Krenakarore (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loket Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724025334/http://home.xnet.com/~ugeiser/Genealogy/Bohemia/elbogencity.html to http://home.xnet.com/~ugeiser/Genealogy/Bohemia/elbogencity.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724025334/http://home.xnet.com/~ugeiser/Genealogy/Bohemia/elbogencity.html to http://home.xnet.com/~ugeiser/Genealogy/Bohemia/elbogencity.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)