Talk:Lola Lennox

Untitled
Recreated the page Lola Lennox with entirely new sources completely attributable to her, including Billboard, BBC, Discovery, People Magazine, Idolator, South China Morning Post, CBS, and others. Thanks! Soulman1125 (talk) 05:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Let the deleting admin decide as they can verify claims made ~ Amkgp 💬  06:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem-- I first contacted the deleting admin before restoring the page and they gave me the old draft to rebuild. I'm sure they will agree upon closer inspection. Thanks.

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... The page in question has been rebuilt with entirely new content from multiple new and reliable sources entirely dedicated to the subject-- including articles and sources from Billboard, People Magazine, Idolator, BBC, CBS, Entertainment Weekly, Refinery29, South China Morning Post, Smooth Radio London, Discovery Channel, KTLA, Yahoo!, MSN, Chicago Tribune, AllMusic, Windy City Times, Bare Magazine, Genius, Get Out! Magazine and others... all the sources I just listed did not exist when the last iteration of this page was created and eventually debated for deletion. When previously deleted, there was a long debate about the subject passing notability requirements, which the subject now clearly does. If you compare the references to today's version to the version when previously deleted, you will notice that this page today is unrecognizable to what was last debated and deleted. Not only are the sources much better and there are more of them-- the content of the article itself is completely different. This version of the article has more than addressed all previous reasons why it was first deleted two years ago. Therefore, this article should be maintained as it currently exists. I don't believe it should be judged hastily by what it used to be, but should be judged instead by what it now is. Thanks. --Soulman1125 (talk) 06:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)