Talk:Lomandra filiformis

Identification
These current two photographs are not L. filiformis, which i know very well as a professional field botanist in eastern Victoria, on & off since the late 1980s. Please refer to here, here, here,here & here, for examples.

Looks like Lomandra longifolia only in flower not in fruit, and/or a weak form or Lomandra longifolia subsp. exilis. In fruit, as can be seen in the photos here & here, the individual fruits are much 'chunkier' than individual flowers, making the inflorescence much 'fatter' looking (sorry not the best words—busy!) Cheers. PS. if i have time i'll come back, perhaps with good photos of my own, and do some work editing. ——--macropneuma 06:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Lomandra filiformis1.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Lomandra filiformis0.jpg