Talk:London Fire Brigade/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: repaired four and tagged 16. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * other various rescue operations  "various"?
 * Lots of lists that need turning into prose.
 * Single sentences and short paragraphs need consolidation; likwise with short sections.
 * Poor prose, spelling and organisation throughout.
 * Lead does not summarise the article, see WP:LEAD
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 16 dead links, some of the other repaired links do not support statements.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The history section is cursory at best; other information that should be there and could be fairly easily found are fuller details of training, funding, political control, etc
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A very definite fail, I am afraid. please familiarise yourself with the good article criteria, work on the article and put up for per preview before considering renomination. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A very definite fail, I am afraid. please familiarise yourself with the good article criteria, work on the article and put up for per preview before considering renomination. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)