Talk:London Grammar

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...

its a rising band now in the position 31 official uk charts references....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/indiesingles

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/apr/22/new-band-day-london-grammar

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/rockandpopfeatures/10116780/London-Grammar-New-Faces.html --Neremg (talk) 18:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * agreed. and they just got signed yesterday by Warner Chappell. So, cynically speaking, they'll soon be everywhere and their music will be inescapable.

also, as i type i'm watching them perform live at the BBC's outdoor park studio as part of the Glastonbury coverage so hardly a bunch of unknowns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.158.63 (talk) 00:39, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Chart positions
Can anyone provide a citation that backs up the claim that the EP charted in Australia? It certainly isn't in the citation given, and should be deleted if one is not forthcoming. Skinsmoke (talk) 00:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

added ref http://www.aria.com.au/documents/ARIAChartsmediarelease14Sept2013.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.156.216 (talk) 08:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Lead tag
I removed the lead tag as it is totally unnecessary (more so given that it has been there for six years) based on the size of the article and the lead. This is like someone adding those unnecessary expand tags; it isn’t needed. Viriditas (talk) 23:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)