Talk:London Philharmonic Orchestra/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: A very well-done article, I only have question about a single image caption.
 * Resolved.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: A very well-done article, I only have question about a single image caption.
 * Resolved.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: A very well-done article, I only have question about a single image caption.
 * Resolved.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
This article is excellent, I think that the peer review back in September ironed out any wrinkles. Prose is solid, scope is well balanced, content is presented neutrally, referencing is excellent, images have suitable licensing. My only problem with this article is that the programme of the first LPO concert is an artistic rendering, not an actual photo. I have no problem with this, but I think the caption should specify that it is a reproduction.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 00:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair point. How do you feel about the addition I've just made? Please feel free to adjust if you like.  Tim riley  talk    11:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Approved!-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review, and the kind remarks you make, above.  Tim riley  talk    19:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)