Talk:Lone Teepee

Proposed merge with Battle of the Little Big Horn
By itself; this article doesn't really give a whole lot. It's briefly mentioned in the one source given and it's hard to search for something like this. I believe it would do much better in the Battle of the Little Big Horn article. The Undead Never Die (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It is amazing that this article was created in 2006 and has remained an unimproved stub since. How it has escaped a speedy deletion nomination is equally amazing. If we created (and allowed to remain) articles with only a brief mention in a reference we could have millions of additional articles. I am not actually a deletionist but value their worth on Wikipedia.
 * This discussion timeline has expired without resolution. This stub could not be logically argued as worthy to occupy article space, by even the most ardent supporter, so I can not imagine a bold moved would have been (or would be) contested. I will submit historical significance of the Lone Teepee (and a half) but it can be covered elsewhere. I have not looked to see if it would be better at the proposed merge location or Battle of the Rosebud, where it receives no prominence, and where a "brief" mention in a reference will suffice for added content. Otr500 (talk) 12:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

But how do you merge them? MossyCobble255 (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Move text from here to the other article and change this into a redirect. And yes, it should be done.Volunteer Marek (talk) 09:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Support merge - While I am not sure we need all this material merged, it should indeed be merged. Soon. Jus  da  fax   10:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Support as per above reasoning Liar&#39;s Lair (talk) 02:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Since consensus was to move (and I agree) I merged info into the Battle of the Little Big Horn article and redirected link there. Thorkall (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)