Talk:Long-distance anchor pylon

Why delete
Seems to me this is a job for WP:MERGE, leaving a WP:REDIRECT rather than Merge and delete. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. After reading all of those pages and finding specific relations to this instance, by procedure you have a damn good point.  I don't think this redirect is necessary whatsoever considering no one uses this term, but I guess if they say it ain't broke don't fix it, there's nothing I can say here.  &mdash;Onore Baka Sama(speak 16:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

That's the way we do it. Maybe there ought to be a book about Wikiediting that we can read on a train or under a tree to cover these fine points but instead we stumble around and sometimes learn from those who have already stumbled in the same place. You're doing all right, proceeding slowly to allow others to be in on your handling of these various articles about electric transmission, a topic of which I know little, so I intend to remain busy with my neighborhood photographic interests and just butt in when something seems to be going awry. Wow, do we have an article about Two-level pylon? Yes, that's one of many that ought to be merged. As to whether the British name or another should be applied, you can mention this and the merger questions in a few talk pages and whatever subprojects of WikiProject Energy may be relevant. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Oh. You have already brought up the naming question in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Energy. I look pretty dumb when I leap before looking. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)