Talk:Long Creek, Oregon

Reversion to previous version
Let's discuss the readding of unencyclopedic wording about non-notable buildings here. This has already been addressed on Thepresident022's talk page. You are correct that more information is better than less, but the way the section is worded now, it reads like original research, opinion (the word "generous" would be considered POV), and the information about the grocery store, who owns what business, etc. doesn't seem particulary notable. If you live there, these things might seem notable to you, but we have to think of the larger picture. More information in terms of history, etc., as EncMstr suggested, would be most welcome. Rather than continually reverting the changes both EncMstr and I have made, please discuss the changes here. Katr67 16:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Long Creek, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/699nOulzi?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)