Talk:Long Hard Road Out of Hell/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Another review, which seem to be getting easier each time. There was a single typo; a dash fix; I changed Composition to Composition and style per the MOS; I removed a small quote that didn't really add anything to the casual readers' understanding of the topic; and I re-arranged a couple of sentences in the Music video sub-section: ;. Other than those: perfecto.


 * All images are creative commons, with exception of the audio file which is less than the 10% limit and has a valid fair-use rationale for this article.
 * Prose is well-written and engaging, spare the single typo I rectified above, and all accurately transcribed from reliable sources.
 * Earwig's tool showed no copyvio, spare the usual direct quotations.
 * No disambiguation or external link issues found.

Happy to promote this. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * 1) Overall: