Talk:Lord Ninian Crichton-Stuart

Requested move 21 May 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by. (closed by non-admin page mover)  SITH   (talk)   09:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Lord Ninian Crichton-Stuart → Ninian Crichton-Stuart (soldier) – I think it would be a tidier way to distinguish it from Ninian Crichton Stuart Dr. Vogel (talk) 08:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Listing this as simply soldier seems a bit strange given that he was a Lord and member of Parliament. Being a soldier was probably the more minor of his roles. Is the current Crichton Stuart actually the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC anyway? Kosack (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually I do have that same concern as well. Particularly because this one seems more "primary-ish" than the current one. Do you think that there should be a disambiguation page, or that this one should be the primary topic instead of the current one? Dr. Vogel (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose. I have moved Ninian Crichton Stuart to Ninian Stuart, his common name. This article follows standard naming conventions for sons of marquesses. See WP:NCPEER #5. Agree that Lord Ninian Crichton-Stuart is the primary redirect for Ninian Crichton Stuart. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Now that you've made that move, it is a lot tidier already. I just wanted it to be tidier, so I am happy to leave it as it is now.
 * What do you reckon about Ninian Crichton Stuart and Ninian Crichton-Stuart? As it stands now, they're redirects, but I think one of them should become a disambiguation page. Dr. Vogel (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Per WP:TWODABS I think they should both redirect to Lord Ninian Crichton-Stuart. Clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, that sounds reasonable. I've changed the target of the 2 redirects, added a hatnote in the article about the primary topic, and withdrawn my original proposal. Dr. Vogel (talk) 12:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Edit: how do I mark my original proposal as withdrawn so that bots don't keep adding a notice in the article? Thanks! Dr. Vogel (talk) 12:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.