Talk:Lord Sunday

Untitled
I don't think this meets the criteria for a speedy deletion judging by the article for Garth Nix. Perhaps an AfD notice would be better or even Prod. Speedy just seems a bit too quick. Lord Sunday seems to be the title of one of the books in the series that is mentioned, so it would probably be as significant as, for example, Lazarus Long. Dismas|(talk) 07:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

End of the series.
The article reads "The books in the series titles' are taken from the major antagonist within them; and since there are seven antagonists, with each having their own book, it is presumed there will be seven books, the last titled Lord Sunday."

Well, its a bit more than presumed now, as the edition of Superior Saturday I just got has the promo-page for Lord Sunday, and that reads "The Keys to the Kingdom will be concluded in Lord Sunday" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.107.110 (talk) 16:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure my copies listed the full line-up of book titles - and therefore, baddies - right from Mister Monday. Or at least, somewhere did. 86.142.103.226 (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Last section??
The last section in this article should not include any predictions about what will happen. That sort of prediction can be discussed in a different place. I will remove the paragraph because it contains potentially inaccurate information.

(Here is what it says: "At the end of Superior Saturday Arthur was falling from the roof of the upper house. It is assumed - but yet unconfirmed - that the will (in the form of a raven) would be able to grow in size (as other parts of the will have done in previous books) swoop down and save Arthur from a grizzly death. He already holds the fifth and sixth keys so he may even be able to transport himself through Friday's mirror to save himself.")WingedSkiCap (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

plot summary
how does it end? it can't just be left "then the story continues" in the middle of the summary. Asdf98761 (talk) 09:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * There was outdated vandalism. It has now been reverted. Stickee (talk) (contribs) 06:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 22:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)