Talk:Lorenzo's Oil

Adrenoleukodystrophy
I deleted a reference to treatment for this disorder as it is best discussed on the Adrenoleukodystrophy page. This is a complex disorder and one reference on a film page won't cut it BillO&#39;Slatter (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Why not go into detail about the treatment? That's one of the most important parts of the film, if not the most important. A majority of the the scenes in Lorenzo's Oil consist of Augusto trying to develop medicine for Lorenzo. The film itself is named after the medicine. FruitSalad4225 (talk) 20:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with O'Slatter, that discussion of therapy doesn't belong here. I think links to the various wiki-pages that get into therapy and the disease are barely adequate (and probably more than most want to know) so I added two sentences touching on the essential issues in a revision to the Reception section (see discussion on Plot section, below) while still focusing on the film, not the therapy.Lapabc (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Communication
"He can no longer see, hear, speak, or move on his own, but can communicate by wiggling his fingers and blinking his eyes.."

So.. how does he know someone is responding to him? Do they tap rhythmically on his shoulder or something? This sentence is pretty undefininative. Disinclination 16:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The phenomenon is known as confirmation bias. Pustelnik (talk) 02:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Article for Star?
Why does Zack O'Malley Greenburg not have an entry? Heck, he hardly has any information anywhere! -- tennis man    sign here!  21:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This was fixed. See discussion of Plot section, belowLapabc (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lorenzos oil.jpg
Image:Lorenzos oil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

'Plot' section
There needs to be a clearer separation between what happened in real life and what happened in the movie. I don't remember the movie showing the son dying at age 30. Borisblue (talk) 10:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Geeze, borisblue, the guy just died yesterday. The movie was made a 15 years ago.  How was the moving suppose to show that the guy died when he was 30? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.59.205.238 (talk • contribs)
 * Yeah, I just split the sections. - Maximusveritas (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I think the Plot section needs to be expanded. Most Wikipedia articles about movies contain a blow-by-blow synopsis of the movie. This is more like a summary, like the blurb written on the back of the DVD case. FruitSalad4225 (talk) 20:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I found the whole article to be a little disorganized and agree that there was a lot more summary rather than description. Separately, I found that follow-up information about the real-life family had been deleted which detracts from the article.  For the Plot section, I fixed it in several ways.  First, following cinematic writing conventions as to when characters are discussed for the first time, I put the names of actors in parentheses... this meant moving Nick Nolte and Susan Sarandon references from the Intro section into the Plot section.  I added detail about other characters/actors.  I added a description of the beginning of the film, whereas previously it jumped into a thematic conclusion that the parents were trying to save their kid, rather than a plot description of what was happening.  I toned down a medical judgement at the end and inserted something about the father being driven to take on the new project.  (Note that in previous versions, this was was explicitly identified as the "Myelin Project" and it was delted... I agree that it doesn't belong in the Plot section but it was important to alluded to this plot element, and something that took a life of its own beyond the movie).


 * I then expanded the "Reception" section to include 4 sentences about "Medical reaction." There actually was a reaction and this is stated and a reference is provided.  But more importantly, people who turn to this article WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE DISEASE AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE REAL PEOPLE so just having wiki-links lying around isn't good enough.  So I put in 2 sentences that explain why it isn't miracle cure, with the final sentence noting that the subject of the film, Lorenzo, eventually died.  I ASK THAT PEOPLE DO NOT DELETE THIS UNDER THE IDEA THAT IT IS EXTRANEOUS TO THE FILM.  This is a very brief and succinct way of informing those people who land on this page seeking that info while sticking to the subject of the article -- the film.  It's about the the subjects of the film, the "cure" and the kid.


 * Finally, someone above asked about Zach O'Malley Greenburg... that was one of the things I fixed in the Plot section, namely identifying him in the text and providing a wiki-link to his article.


 * Regards to all, Lapabc (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

2013 Comedy Film?
Really? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.17.119.40 (talk) 21:28, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * It was vandalism. I've fixed the article. Thanks for the heads-up! Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Cultural references
I wonder if this article should include cultural references to the movie. It's such a memorable movie that there should be quite a few. The only one I know of is in the movie Paul Paul_(film) where Jason Bateman's character, Agent Zoil, reveals near the end of the movie that his first name is Lorenzo - "Lorenzo Zoil". I have little experience editing Wikipedia so if this is considered worth mentioning, could someone else add it please. KrisBlueNZ (talk) 06:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC)KrisBlueNZ

Repeated removal of infobox
The infobox has been removed (and replaced) multiple times. Only once was an edit summary left with "Wrong information". If there is a problem, please explain it here. Include what is wrong, what the correct information should be and add wp:reliable sources supporting your points. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)