Talk:Lori Wick

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lori Wick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070101234916/http://www.harvesthousepublishers.com/books_fiction_author.cfm?ed_id=100307 to http://www.harvesthousepublishers.com/books_fiction_author.cfm?ed_id=100307

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Notability & Where This Article Fits
She is significant within her genre, so I think this information needs to be somewhere but I do not know where. Based on the Teahouse Discussion, it does not seem like the article meets guidelines for a biography or author page. However, just because it does not have enough coverage it does not seem right to take it out entirely. I think it just needs help finding its place. Suggestions? If I understand the top of the Talk Page it does not seem like it is enough for any of those other literary sections either. - MysticalFairyAstha (talk) 06:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)


 * She might be notable based on her inclusion in secondary sources; apparently there is a bit of criticism of her works, as summarised in Tischler's book, and that could also be a sign of notability, if it can only be found and discussed in the article. I'm on the fence about this one - I'm not convinced she's notable per the notability guidelines for authors or those for all biographies, but I'm also not sure she isn't. --bonadea contributions talk 16:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)