Talk:Lorna Taylor

COI review
This article was created under a conflict of interest (see tag above) and still needs to be reviewed for NPOV. I reviewed it down to the the Awards and Recognition section, which still needs going over. I haven't yet gone and looked for sources on my own yet either, to ensure that the existing content really expresses NPOV with regard to what reliable sources say about her. Jytdog (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Is there anything I can do to expedite the removal of the conflict of interest tag? I have a hot-linked reference list. Thanks!--Mustangsdtpa (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I happen to read the article and it never occurred to me that this article is written by someone with conflict of interest, because it has only that info that has already been published in secondary reliable sources, I think we should judge the article by its content not by its editor's revelation of any link (in this case only) we should trim any info (if there is any) that suggests COI. I think we should work here to address this COI issue rather just point it out and leave, as in my humble view it affects Wiki quality to have articles with different tags on them. As for the fact that the article is not balanced, I searched and didn't found out any critique about Lorna Taylor, how can someone make the article balance if there is no references or sources for any critique. kindly advice and lets together work this issue out. Cheers! JohnKeith (talk) 17:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * John keith, it is great that you searched and found nothing negative. I hadn't done that yet.  That checks one of the things.  Now somebody needs to go through the Awards and Recognition section,  (where there is a somewhat absurd pile of sources) and make sure the sources are real and awards are noteworthy enough to mention, and are not just puffery.  once somebody does that (in other words, and the article has been fully reviewed for NPOV), the tag can come off.  Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have taken out content that might give the impression of non-neutrality, only those awards are listed that are referenced. I think the tag should now come off. Thanks JohnKeith (talk) 16:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks! Jytdog (talk) 16:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Would you specifically identify which statement still requires review, I see you are a Reviewer would you be kind enough to address the issue here also. JohnKeith (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * sure. but would be please let me know if you have any conflict of interest with regard to this issue?  Please read WP:COI and especially the section on the Terms of Use, which require editors to "disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation."  Thanks. Am asking because of this Jytdog (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)