Talk:Lorraine Day/Archives/2014

Needs Help
This article needs to be reviewed by Wikipedia. It is simply a slam against a hard working, well respected and reputable MD Doctor who has helped thousands of people heal themselves from Cancer, diabetes, etc. She doesn't sell any products (except for helpful videos) but encourages the sick person to clean up their act, the reason they are sick in the first place. I know, I did. Please change this poorly written article and remove the one sided opposition presented. It is a discredit to the usually well done Wikipedia. Thanks Nancy Gill, teacher, Mother, and very healthy (cancer free) woman thanks to Dr Day's simple, inexpensive advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happyorchid2 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Has anyone actually read her "other" website? It is a rather full compendium of conspiracy theories and Jew Hatred. Just click on the site and look around. Someone took a lot of time to compile pretty much every anti-Jewish conspiracy and hate slander and organize them for her religious site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.248.28.151 (talk) 09:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

That whole section I titled Philosophy was someone's rant up at the beginning for her bio. I just moved it all down lower. I did not know where to start on it so I just left it and tried to make the intro statement more like the other bios. I tried to copy Martin Luther King Jr's and the lady US Atty General's for style.Kristinwt (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I can understand the hesitancy of jumping in on a controversial person. If you bother to edit you could get into a revert war and who wants to be a part of that? Also, WP does not permit primary source text, you have to quote someone else who got something published. Yet WP only permits primary source images. So, you can't quote the person if you had a conversation, but you better have taken that picture yourself if you want it to stay up. Messed up, I know. We could use a nice professional pic to go with the bio. Kristinwt (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Ref Dr Day's comments on Jewish people. Dr Day seems to have developed her attitude towards Jewish people when she began to campaign for safety precautions for surgeons performing operations on Gays in San Francisco at the beginning of the AIDs epidemic. Human Rights, and Civil Rights Advocates began challenging Dr Day's stance. As many Human Rights Advocates seemed to be Jewish to Dr Day, the Doctor seems to have believed this was a 'Jewish' challenge to her campaign, and not a Human Rights challenge. Since her original campaign for better safety for surgeons, Dr Day has progressed to holding views about Jewish people which must be incomprehensible to the average American.Johnwrd (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2014 (UTC)