Talk:Los Angeles Rams draft history

I have no idea why the page I created was rejected. There are many others in the category Category:National Football League Draft history by team, not all created by me, and many of those also have a page solely devoted to first-round picks. Ellipsis22 (talk) 01:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You're correct with that. I see that you also did the work to create many of those pages as well. My quick answer is that they were made in 2008 and Wikipedia is a different place now than it was then. Almanac articles like this are less well received than they were then. I have mixed feelings about this but it's the reality we're in. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

So I assume you'll be deleting and redirecting the other pages in that category in order to better conform to Wikipedia's 2018 standards? Ellipsis22 (talk) 01:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I could but that's not my style. I tend to deal with what comes through the New Pages feed or which I otherwise come to organically and feel a need to fix. I am not in the habit of redirecting pages which go back to 200 (see my mixed feelings). Does that make this better or worse for you? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It's "not your style" to clean up a category of pages that are no longer up to the standard you used to delete and redirect this page. So yeah, it makes it a little worse despite your "mixed feelings". Best, Ellipsis22 (talk) 02:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That's why I asked - I wasn't sure how you would take it. Some people would take it the wrong way if I went and redirected a whole slew of pages at once - while BOLD it would also potentially be disruptive and that's why I don't do it. Obviously my thinking isn't the final word on the topic of draft pick pages. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)