Talk:Loss of right in English law

Worried about original research
Isn't the correct title of this article Chester v. Afshar? The Denningesque extrapolation to a general principle feels like it goes too far. Is this verifiable or is it original research? If this article had nothing to discuss other than Chester and its implications then that's the correct title.Cutler 00:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Article too vague
This article needs more explanation as to specifically what "Loss of right" is and how it differs from causation.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loss of right in English law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060223144232/http://www.lawinabox.net/lbnewswire07e.html to http://www.lawinabox.net/lbnewswire07e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)